CurlTalk

What do you think the war in Iraq is about?

curlyarcacurlyarca Posts: 8,449Registered Users
This is a spinoff of sorts r/t the gas thread on the non hair board.

If you choose other, do you mind clarifying?

"In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."

4a, mbl, low porosity, normal thickness, fine hair.
Failed to load the poll.
Failed to load the poll.

Comments

  • miacurlmiacurl Posts: 332Registered Users
    Oil. And also retribution for Pres. Bush's father not getting Saddam. I cannot back it up. Just my thoughts.
    2C/3A auburn hair.
    between shoulders and BSL
  • SapphireWingstarSapphireWingstar Posts: 381Registered Users
    Oil. I can't back it up right now, but it's my thoughts.
    3b/c...or thereabouts.

    Album: /home/leaving?target=http%3A%2F%2Fphotobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa119%2FCrazyCurlyQ%2F" class="Popup

    Password: curlomania
    (albums are on the lefthand side)
  • CherishCherish Posts: 1,847Registered Users
    miacurl wrote:
    Oil. And also retribution for Pres. Bush's father not getting Saddam. I cannot back it up. Just my thoughts.

    He said himself on TV, that he wanted to get: "the man who tried to kill my Daddy". That's enough proof for me.

    Of course, oil, so we can continue to buy gas at artificially deflated prices. Not sure what went wrong there...
  • dia99dia99 Posts: 1,998Registered Users
    Other. Spreading Christianity, along with spreading democracy (which is the quickest way to spread Christianity), along with oil (that's just greed, I guess, but he could say he wants to have the money to spread Christianity :) ), along with retribution for his "daddy" (honor thy father and mother - so he can still fit that into his religious views, too).

    Sorry I'm posting so late, I didn't even no this forum existed until today!

    Lydia
    People rise to the standard expected of them. GC
  • MOAMANAMOAMANA Posts: 8Registered Users
    AN ARABIC OPINION
    IT IS NT JUST THE OIL BUT CONTROLLING OUR LANDS, GOVRNMENTS AND PEOPLE
    BECAUSE THE SAME PLAN WILL TAKE PLACE IN IRAN THEN SYRIA THEN ANOTHER ARABIC COUNTRY AND SO ON

    OUR LANDS ARE FULL OF OIL, GOLD AND MANY OTHER TREASURES

    AMERICA IS DOING NOTHING BUT REPEATING THE HISTORY
    100 YEARS AGO, WE WERE OCCUPIED BY ENGLAND N OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES .NOW THEY ARE WEAK AND AMERICA IS THE STRONGEST SO IT IS TIME FOR AMERICA TO HAVE COLONIES ALL OVER THE WORLD

    AS AN ARABIC I KNOW THAT THE WEAKNESS , IGNORANCE , POVERTY AND CORRUPTED GOVERNMENTS ARE THE REASON FOR BEING WEAK ........SO IT IS MY FAULT AND TRYING HARD TO CHANGE IT




    BUT FOR YOU AMERICAN CITIZENS .................................DO U AGREE OR NOT FOR BEING THE NEW CRUEL ROMAN EMPIRE ?????????????/

    THE ANSWER FOR MY QUESTION IS KNOWN TO ALL THE WORLD..........YOU HAVE RE-ELECTED BUSH
    i am egyptian with 3b black shoulder length hair
    islam rules states that 11-9 terroristic attack is wrong....so i m so sorry that there are some lunatics call themselves moslems
  • ScarletScarlet Posts: 3,125Registered Users
    Propoganda
    The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all those who want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics - Thomas Sowell
  • eccentric_kurlzeccentric_kurlz Posts: 4,144Registered Users
    MOAMANA wrote:
    AN ARABIC OPINION
    IT IS NT JUST THE OIL BUT CONTROLLING OUR LANDS, GOVRNMENTS AND PEOPLE
    BECAUSE THE SAME PLAN WILL TAKE PLACE IN IRAN THEN SYRIA THEN ANOTHER ARABIC COUNTRY AND SO ON

    OUR LANDS ARE FULL OF OIL, GOLD AND MANY OTHER TREASURES

    AMERICA IS DOING NOTHING BUT REPEATING THE HISTORY
    100 YEARS AGO, WE WERE OCCUPIED BY ENGLAND N OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES .NOW THEY ARE WEAK AND AMERICA IS THE STRONGEST SO IT IS TIME FOR AMERICA TO HAVE COLONIES ALL OVER THE WORLD

    AS AN ARABIC I KNOW THAT THE WEAKNESS , IGNORANCE , POVERTY AND CORRUPTED GOVERNMENTS ARE THE REASON FOR BEING WEAK ........SO IT IS MY FAULT AND TRYING HARD TO CHANGE IT




    BUT FOR YOU AMERICAN CITIZENS .................................DO U AGREE OR NOT FOR BEING THE NEW CRUEL ROMAN EMPIRE ?????????????/

    THE ANSWER FOR MY QUESTION IS KNOWN TO ALL THE WORLD..........YOU HAVE RE-ELECTED BUSH

    That's a huge, and over generalized statement. I think the war was for alot of reasons, many of which we will never really know about. But for you to imply that whatever the president does, as a concensus, represents EVERY single person in this country, is quite ignorant. But, you are entitled to your opinion.
    A wonderful mix of coils, curls, corkscrews, and kinks.

    /home/leaving?target=http%3A%2F%2Fs211.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fbb133%2Fshyygirl_2007%2F" class="Popup
    PW: curlyhair

    I have a blog now. Follow meeeee! :)

    /home/leaving?target=http%3A%2F%2Fnaturalurbanista.blogspot.com%2F" class="Popup

    "You see, when it comes to language competence, a true patriot must hit that sweet spot between "job-stealing immigrant" and "liberal elitist." ~Eilonwy

    Wanna have access to the top names in fashion and luxury at up to 70% off retail? Sure you do. /home/leaving?target=http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F3yxneol" class="Popup

    DC metro area
  • MOAMANAMOAMANA Posts: 8Registered Users
    propaganda ..............a nice word .........didnt the americans occupy iraq by a huge propaganda claiming that they have nuclear weapons, that sadam is related to qada and much more ....which is proven to be just lies

    what is the propaganda ???????????????????

    i dare you ask any arabic about the situation in iraq ......i dare you ask the american soldiers about what really goes on there ?????????i dare you watch other channels than the american.....or why not pay a visit to iraq and see yourself???????????????????????????/

    do you think that soldiers of other country ,languae ,culture and religion in a condition of war can be really friends to the people they occupy......it isnt a movie where a happy ending is a must.


    shygirl723

    no matter the reasons are for the war you should have an opinion is it wrong or right?

    not every single american approves the war .......i know that...but what about the people who elected bush?
    and those who didnt elect him and didnt approve the war ....what did they do to change their government opinion?


    i ve never visited america.....but i read american magazines ...i listen and watch your channels and movies ...and i saw how your media is twisting the truth

    if anybody is really interested let him not listen to what i say let him seek the truth himself.......and he will find it somewhere
    i am egyptian with 3b black shoulder length hair
    islam rules states that 11-9 terroristic attack is wrong....so i m so sorry that there are some lunatics call themselves moslems
  • alguma pessoaalguma pessoa Posts: 619Registered Users
    That's a huge, and over generalized statement. I think the war was for alot of reasons, many of which we will never really know about. But for you to imply that whatever the president does, as a concensus, represents EVERY single person in this country, is quite ignorant. But, you are entitled to your opinion.

    Sorry to quote you shygirl (nothing personal) but as someone who has lived outside of the US this is the general opinion of non-North Americans. It is *partially* wrong but like all stereotypes it has its roots in some sort of truth.

    BTW, people from the US generalize about other people ALL of the time.

    And for all of you who think this is "propaganda" try living outside of the country (not with the military) and see which side is pushing propaganda. :wink:

    I cannot help but think of the propaganda pushed out during the interference in Nicaragua and Panama. The people of the US only find out the truth after the fact (if at all)......Not saying that the other parties are right...just saying I can understand how people would react in a situation of invasion. The civilians on all sides are the losers.


    I think the war is about control and power (in all aspects).
    We're all born mad. Some remain so.

    br-flag1.gif
  • michellermicheller Posts: 470Registered Users
    Cehua wrote:

    And for all of you who think this is "propaganda" try living outside of the country (not with the military) and see which side is pushing propaganda. :wink:
    .


    Truer words have never been spoken. Unfortunately, those people who think only other countries feed their people full of "propganda" will probably never venture past the U.S. borders to see the truth.
  • =~ohura~==~ohura~= Posts: 255Registered Users
    I voted other because...Hasn't anyone been listening to our President? The answer is all of the above. :P
    .jpg
    Do a better job of covering your stinky aliass.
  • FidoGwenFidoGwen Posts: 92Registered Users
    Oops! Double post!
    I'm a 2something/3something. Started modified CG routine on 6/6/05
    Cut more than ten inches from my BSL hair on 8-10-05 and growing it long again
    But we're STILL adjusting. ;-)
  • FidoGwenFidoGwen Posts: 92Registered Users
    Yes
    Yes
    Yes
    Maybe
    Yes

    If you really want to get me started on this, be warned - I am very blunt and opinionated!
    I'm a 2something/3something. Started modified CG routine on 6/6/05
    Cut more than ten inches from my BSL hair on 8-10-05 and growing it long again
    But we're STILL adjusting. ;-)
  • CherishCherish Posts: 1,847Registered Users
    FidoGwen wrote:
    If you really want to get me started on this, be warned - I am very blunt and opinionated!

    Don't hold back.. go for it! :D
  • FidoGwenFidoGwen Posts: 92Registered Users
    Alright then, but you were warned!

    Saadam had to be taken out of power. No question about it. We (America) had given him too many chances to stop killing his people en masse and he had ample oppurtunity to hide/stowe/dismantle and just plain get rid of, WMD's. I don't know for sure that he had them, but if he did, he would have been a total idiot to still have them by the time we invaded! Saadam is many things, but I don't think he is that stupid. We did find money from the Bank of Jordan among Saadams posessions. Joradn is known to have Al Quida

    Have to go . . . will finish later.
    I'm a 2something/3something. Started modified CG routine on 6/6/05
    Cut more than ten inches from my BSL hair on 8-10-05 and growing it long again
    But we're STILL adjusting. ;-)
  • CherishCherish Posts: 1,847Registered Users
    Waiting....
  • FidoGwenFidoGwen Posts: 92Registered Users
    :)
    Jordan is know to have Al Quada(sp?) traing camps. Quite a few of them if I remember.
    Be careful when claiming "propaganda." Just about anything that is "tainted" with a persons opinion or biases can be considered propaganda. And anything that is publicized by a government is propaganda. Government (democracy, tyranny and all in between) is tainted with people's biases and opinions, if it wasn't it would be purely mechanical, and even then it would have the biases and opinions of it's creator! All advertising is propaganda.
    We are there to set up a democracy. To some degree, every time we give another country democracy, we are experimenting. But it's an experiment we tried on ourselves first!
    We are the most generous nation. We give out more money and more aid than any other country. Being the most powerful nation, that is as it should be. I think the second most generous country is Australia, but I'm not sure.
    Let's be honest, if America was as mean and cruel as so many people say we are, why didn't we just bomb out Iraq? Biological warfare would have "solved the problem" so much easier!! If we really didn't care about the Iraqi people, why are most of them alive and free? Not that I agree with wiping out whole nations, but so many people talk as if that is what we are doing! Yes, we are quite ignorant of Iraqi culture, and most of the soldiers over there are trying to live without offending anybody. But they are there to do a job. They are trying to keep peace, they are giving their lives to give the Iraqi people freedom and peace. Not that all soldiers over there are perfect Americans, but for the most part they are trying. And yes, they are bringing Western culture with them! It's not a conspiracy to Americanize Iraq. It is a bunch of lonely men and women trying to feel at home in a foreign land. They want that familiarity. Because they are human! Not the "killing machines" that the media likes to call them.
    Yes, our government and our media are spreading propaganda. Most intelligent people are aware of that. Most people prefer to overlook or just plain ignore the propaganda.
    I, personally, don't care if Saddam had nuclear weapons or WMD's. We have found multiple mass graves full of disposed Iraqi's. How many innocent people have to die before war is the necessarry evil? I know that innocent people die in war, but the idea is, after war the innocent people stop being murdered en masse. I also know that it doesn't always work that way, but that is just one of the reasons we are fighting this war.
    I'm a 2something/3something. Started modified CG routine on 6/6/05
    Cut more than ten inches from my BSL hair on 8-10-05 and growing it long again
    But we're STILL adjusting. ;-)
  • CherishCherish Posts: 1,847Registered Users
    FidoGwen wrote:
    Alright then, but you were warned!

    Saadam had to be taken out of power. No question about it. We (America) had given him too many chances to stop killing his people en masse and he had ample oppurtunity to hide/stowe/dismantle and just plain get rid of, WMD's. I don't know for sure that he had them, but if he did, he would have been a total idiot to still have them by the time we invaded! Saadam is many things, but I don't think he is that stupid. We did find money from the Bank of Jordan among Saadams posessions. Joradn is known to have Al Quida

    Have to go . . . will finish later.

    Interesting.

    As far as I know, the US has WMDs... should other countries invade and disarm it?

    I don't understand the connection you're making between Jordan having al quaeda and Saddam having money in Jordan...
  • CherishCherish Posts: 1,847Registered Users
    FidoGwen wrote:
    :)
    Jordan is know to have Al Quada(sp?) traing camps. Quite a few of them if I remember.
    Be careful when claiming "propaganda." Just about anything that is "tainted" with a persons opinion or biases can be considered propaganda. And anything that is publicized by a government is propaganda. Government (democracy, tyranny and all in between) is tainted with people's biases and opinions, if it wasn't it would be purely mechanical, and even then it would have the biases and opinions of it's creator! All advertising is propaganda.
    We are there to set up a democracy. To some degree, every time we give another country democracy, we are experimenting. But it's an experiment we tried on ourselves first!

    Why do they need your democracy?
    We are the most generous nation. We give out more money and more aid than any other country. Being the most powerful nation, that is as it should be. I think the second most generous country is Australia, but I'm not sure.
    Let's be honest, if America was as mean and cruel as so many people say we are, why didn't we just bomb out Iraq? Biological warfare would have "solved the problem" so much easier!!

    The US did bomb Iraq. Why not use biological warfare? Because the sane people of this land who pay taxes to fund wars would not have stood for it.
    If we really didn't care about the Iraqi people, why are most of them alive and free? Not that I agree with wiping out whole nations, but so many people talk as if that is what we are doing! Yes, we are quite ignorant of Iraqi culture, and most of the soldiers over there are trying to live without offending anybody. But they are there to do a job. They are trying to keep peace, they are giving their lives to give the Iraqi people freedom and peace. Not that all soldiers over there are perfect Americans, but for the most part they are trying. And yes, they are bringing Western culture with them! It's not a conspiracy to Americanize Iraq. It is a bunch of lonely men and women trying to feel at home in a foreign land. They want that familiarity. Because they are human! Not the "killing machines" that the media likes to call them.

    I don't think the intent was to wipe out Iraqis at all. No one is saying that, as far as I can tell. I have also not seen soldiers being depicted as "killing machines" by the media.
    Yes, our government and our media are spreading propaganda. Most intelligent people are aware of that. Most people prefer to overlook or just plain ignore the propaganda.
    I, personally, don't care if Saddam had nuclear weapons or WMD's. We have found multiple mass graves full of disposed Iraqi's. How many innocent people have to die before war is the necessarry evil? I know that innocent people die in war, but the idea is, after war the innocent people stop being murdered en masse. I also know that it doesn't always work that way, but that is just one of the reasons we are fighting this war.

    You are opinionated for sure... very interesting :)
  • FidoGwenFidoGwen Posts: 92Registered Users
    Seems to me that the US does have WMD's. Having them is not the problem, using them is. We have WMD's, but we don't have mass graves, where people are thrown in there like garbage. Like they were never human to begin with.

    I'm not sure what the exact connection is between Saddam and Jordan. The Prince of Jordan refuses to talk to American media about the training camps, and he is open about most everything else. Dare I say, flamboyant? I'm not saying that Saddam having the money is proof of anything, it's just very suspicious that he had a bank's worth of money from the Bank of Jordan in one of his vaults.

    They don't need our democracy. They need something different. Democracy is what we know and love. We are setting them up to govern themselves, once we leave, they can do what ever they want - maybe not right away . . . but after they give "our democracy" a try.

    Yes, we did bomb Iraq. Intelligently. We went after hideouts, military targets and tied to avoid civilian places - which is not always possible. We didn't just bomb everything that moved. In past confrontations, Saddam was the one who surrounded his palace with women and children, knowing that we wouldn't purposely attack innocent people. We refrain from using biological warfare because it is too unpredictable, too many innocent people would die. And yes, the American people would be outraged. Even us war-monger conservatives! :roll: :lol:

    I have heard/seen the media depicting soldiers as killing machines. The media was smart enough to back off from that approach a while ago. Say what you will about the war and our government, but (for the most part) leave our soldiers alone. Side note: The Marines seemed to have gotten the worst treatment because they are aggressive. Ummm, that's kind of their job. Special forces are known for being aggressive, and the Marines used to be the special forces for the Navy.

    ETA - By the way, I'm not try to insult, embarrass or degrade (or anything else like that) anyone in any way! I'm just stating my point of view in hopes that maybe someone will try to see this war from a perspective they are not used to. And for the fun of it! 8) :lol: I realize I'm not going to change anyone's mind, just trying to show my view. :)
    I'm a 2something/3something. Started modified CG routine on 6/6/05
    Cut more than ten inches from my BSL hair on 8-10-05 and growing it long again
    But we're STILL adjusting. ;-)
  • CherishCherish Posts: 1,847Registered Users
    FidoGwen wrote:
    Seems to me that the US does have WMD's. Having them is not the problem, using them is. We have WMD's, but we don't have mass graves, where people are thrown in there like garbage. Like they were never human to begin with.

    I'm confused... are you saying these mass graves are proof that Saddam used WMDs? You realize there's no proof he had WMDs, regardless of whether or not you think he did, right??
    I'm not sure what the exact connection is between Saddam and Jordan. The Prince of Jordan refuses to talk to American media about the training camps, and he is open about most everything else. Dare I say, flamboyant? I'm not saying that Saddam having the money is proof of anything, it's just very suspicious that he had a bank's worth of money from the Bank of Jordan in one of his vaults.

    Ok, you're just speculating...
    They don't need our democracy. They need something different.

    Really? What?
    Democracy is what we know and love. We are setting them up to govern themselves, once we leave, they can do what ever they want - maybe not right away . . . but after they give "our democracy" a try.

    If they can do whatever they want once the US, which is precisely what they were doing, then what was the point??

    I could be wrong, but I think you mean they can do what they want provided they don't return to a dictatorship or similar... ;)
    Yes, we did bomb Iraq. Intelligently. We went after hideouts, military targets and tied to avoid civilian places - which is not always possible. We didn't just bomb everything that moved. In past confrontations, Saddam was the one who surrounded his palace with women and children, knowing that we wouldn't purposely attack innocent people. We refrain from using biological warfare because it is too unpredictable, too many innocent people would die. And yes, the American people would be outraged. Even us war-monger conservatives! :roll: :lol:

    I have heard/seen the media depicting soldiers as killing machines. The media was smart enough to back off from that approach a while ago. Say what you will about the war and our government, but (for the most part) leave our soldiers alone. Side note: The Marines seemed to have gotten the worst treatment because they are aggressive. Ummm, that's kind of their job. Special forces are known for being aggressive, and the Marines used to be the special forces for the Navy.

    Um... ok.
    ETA - By the way, I'm not try to insult, embarrass or degrade (or anything else like that) anyone in any way! I'm just stating my point of view in hopes that maybe someone will try to see this war from a perspective they are not used to. And for the fun of it! 8) :lol: I realize I'm not going to change anyone's mind, just trying to show my view. :)

    The media played much of this war from your perspective, so I'm pretty familiar with it ;)

    Don't worry - your point of view does not insult, embarrass or degrade me :)
  • dia99dia99 Posts: 1,998Registered Users
    FidoGwen,

    I'm curious what you think America should be doing to combat the terror of drugs and poverty on our own soil?

    It seems that it is much easier for conservative Republicans to try to "fix" other countries with substandard governments and cultures (this is what I've heard, not what I believe) than to work within our own culture to eradicate the terror that is drug addiction, prostitution, rape, murder, poverty, pedophilia, etc. I think we could use more special forces here trying to fix our own nation. Oh, I forgot, we have laws to protect our rapists and murderers. :roll:

    And, I agree with Cherish on the WMD point. America is quite pompous to think that we should be the only country qualified to own WMDs, or even that we should get to decide which other countries possess them. I'm not sure, but this God complex our government, and some of our citizens, seems to have surely can't help with our separation of church and state stance. :roll:


    I am not against aid to other countries in need. I am against us only giving aid when it suits our political needs or projections, and when the countries receiving help are forced to dance on our puppet strings to get it.
    People rise to the standard expected of them. GC
  • ScarletScarlet Posts: 3,125Registered Users
    The war on drugs was lost a long time ago. Going after the two-bit dealers on the streets looks good on the evening news, but it does nothing. There is no real will to fight this battle.
    The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all those who want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics - Thomas Sowell
  • dia99dia99 Posts: 1,998Registered Users
    Scarlet wrote:
    The war on drugs was lost a long time ago. Going after the two-bit dealers on the streets looks good on the evening news, but it does nothing. There is no real will to fight this battle.

    ITA!

    I'm just wondering if it's because we're such a wonderful nation that we're fighting "other people's" wars and not concerning ourselves with the pillage happening in our own society. Where's the war against the countries who smuggle these drugs into our nation, or the guns that gang members use to terrorize inner city streets?
    People rise to the standard expected of them. GC
  • CherishCherish Posts: 1,847Registered Users
    Where's FidoGwen...?
  • AmnerisAmneris Posts: 15,117Registered Users
    FidoGwen wrote:
    Yes, we did bomb Iraq. Intelligently.

    This HAS to win the award for Oxymoron of the Year.
    Get used to me. Black, confident, cocky; my name, not yours; my religion, not yours; my goals, my own; get used to me. -Muhammad Ali


    .png


    534Pm5.png





  • FidoGwenFidoGwen Posts: 92Registered Users
    Sorry, I've been having problems with my connection to the internet.

    First, let me say that America is corrupt. Our government is corrupt - I don't mean by any party or specific school of thought, just generally corrupted by corrupt poeple.
    FidoGwen wrote:

    Yes, we did bomb Iraq. Intelligently.


    This HAS to win the award for Oxymoron of the Year
    Yeah, not one of the best things I've ever said. :oops: My point still stands, but I could have said it better.
    Where's the war against the countries who smuggle these drugs into our nation, or the guns that gang members use to terrorize inner city streets?
    Not that I think it's right, but here (in Arizona) we aren't really going after the "supplying country" because we share the border with them. We are trying to have good relations with Mexico while keeping 'contraband' out of our country. I think we should tighten the borders . . . . but that's off subject. Another part of the reason we don't fight the supplying countries is because that would start World War Three.

    I grew up in the ghetto. Seriously, when our living quarters were shot up, I slept through it - as did the rest of my family. Later, we were told that there were about five shots fired and then a car squealed it's tires as it fled, not to mention the car alarms that set off. We were so used to hearing that crap that it didn't even wake us up. In that same neighborhood, my brother would be a runner for drug deals (we moved from there when he was about twelve) and prostitutes were all over the place. It was a slum that was owned by the mob.
    Having had that experience I can tell you that no one "fix" will ever work. Some hookers will be hookers no matter what you do for them or what you tell them. Drug users won't stop until they hit bottom. A lot of users die hitting bottom. Drug dealers won't go away until people are no longer willing to spend big bucks on their drugs. Because that's the way people are. If you can find some sort of formula that works, I will personally help you form a grassroots movement to get the government to adopt it!
    Oh, I forgot, we have laws to protect our rapists and murderers.
    What's sad is that we aslo have laws protecting pedophiles. And organizations willing to support them all the way. NAMBLA comes to mind. The organizations are usually what get the protective laws in place.
    America is quite pompous to think that we should be the only country qualified to own WMDs, or even that we should get to decide which other countries possess them.
    I agree, but what other checks and balances are there? It is very arrogant of America to think that we have all the answers to the world's problems. We don't have the answers. And to be honest, I don't think the government as a whole has a God complex. Most politicians, yes, the government as a whole . . . . just arrogant. At some point, America may need to seem arrogant to everyone. We are currently the most powerful nation, the big sister, if you will. The big sister - or brother if you prefer - is supposed to help take care of the "little siblings." Not that they can't take care of themselves, but sometimes they need help. Sometimes they can't take care of themselves. And that is a very fine line. We, on a human to human level don't get it right. How can we expect the goverment (just of bunch of powerful humans) to get it right? Besides, everyone has a different idea of what is right. That's how we can have this awesome thread going. :)
    Ok, you're just speculating...
    Yep. I'm not Saddam, I never was. All I have is what our government is allowing the public to know. (For the record, I appreciate that the gov. isn't telling us everything. We don't need to know it all, and America doesn't need to be tipping it's hand, so to speak.) I cannot say, as fact, that Saddam had WMD's and was using them on his own people. I can say, as fact, that he was allowing his people to be mass murdered and their bodies to be dumped in mass graves. America does not tolerate that kind of sadism very well.
    Quote:

    They don't need our democracy. They need something different.



    Really? What?
    If I knew I would tell you, the government, the media . . . . I would stand on my roof and scream it to my neighborhood. :)
    If they can do whatever they want once the US, which is precisely what they were doing, then what was the point??
    Letting them choose if they want to be under another dictator or if they want to form some other kind of government. Giving them democracy is our way of giving them a clean slate. Like I said before, it's what we know and love.
    I'm a 2something/3something. Started modified CG routine on 6/6/05
    Cut more than ten inches from my BSL hair on 8-10-05 and growing it long again
    But we're STILL adjusting. ;-)
  • CherishCherish Posts: 1,847Registered Users
    FidoGwen, you should read this thread:

    War...killer of culture...and spirit
  • CherishCherish Posts: 1,847Registered Users
    For future reference:

    Secret US Plans for Iraq's Oil
    The Bush administration made plans for war and for Iraq's oil before the 9/11 attacks, sparking a policy battle between neo-cons and Big Oil, BBC's Newsnight has revealed.


    Iraqi-born Falah Aljibury says US Neo-Conservatives planned to force a coup d'etat in Iraq
    Two years ago today - when President George Bush announced US, British and Allied forces would begin to bomb Baghdad - protesters claimed the US had a secret plan for Iraq's oil once Saddam had been conquered.

    In fact there were two conflicting plans, setting off a hidden policy war between neo-conservatives at the Pentagon, on one side, versus a combination of "Big Oil" executives and US State Department "pragmatists".

    "Big Oil" appears to have won. The latest plan, obtained by Newsnight from the US State Department was, we learned, drafted with the help of American oil industry consultants.

    Insiders told Newsnight that planning began "within weeks" of Bush's first taking office in 2001, long before the September 11th attack on the US.


    We saw an increase in the bombing of oil facilities and pipelines [in Iraq] built on the premise that privatisation is coming
    Mr Falah Aljibury
    An Iraqi-born oil industry consultant, Falah Aljibury, says he took part in the secret meetings in California, Washington and the Middle East. He described a State Department plan for a forced coup d'etat.

    Mr Aljibury himself told Newsnight that he interviewed potential successors to Saddam Hussein on behalf of the Bush administration.

    Secret sell-off plan

    The industry-favoured plan was pushed aside by a secret plan, drafted just before the invasion in 2003, which called for the sell-off of all of Iraq's oil fields. The new plan was crafted by neo-conservatives intent on using Iraq's oil to destroy the Opec cartel through massive increases in production above Opec quotas.


    Former Shell Oil USA chief stalled plans to privatise Iraq's oil industry
    The sell-off was given the green light in a secret meeting in London headed by Fadhil Chalabi shortly after the US entered Baghdad, according to Robert Ebel.

    Mr Ebel, a former Energy and CIA oil analyst, now a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, told Newsnight he flew to the London meeting at the request of the State Department.

    Mr Aljibury, once Ronald Reagan's "back-channel" to Saddam, claims that plans to sell off Iraq's oil, pushed by the US-installed Governing Council in 2003, helped instigate the insurgency and attacks on US and British occupying forces.

    "Insurgents used this, saying, 'Look, you're losing your country, you're losing your resources to a bunch of wealthy billionaires who want to take you over and make your life miserable,'" said Mr Aljibury from his home near San Francisco.

    "We saw an increase in the bombing of oil facilities, pipelines, built on the premise that privatisation is coming."

    Privatisation blocked by industry

    Philip Carroll, the former CEO of Shell Oil USA who took control of Iraq's oil production for the US Government a month after the invasion, stalled the sell-off scheme.

    Mr Carroll told us he made it clear to Paul Bremer, the US occupation chief who arrived in Iraq in May 2003, that: "There was to be no privatisation of Iraqi oil resources or facilities while I was involved."


    Amy Jaffee says oil companies fear a privatisation would exclude foreign firms
    Ariel Cohen, of the neo-conservative Heritage Foundation, told Newsnight that an opportunity had been missed to privatise Iraq's oil fields.

    He advocated the plan as a means to help the US defeat Opec, and said America should have gone ahead with what he called a "no-brainer" decision.

    Mr Carroll hit back, telling Newsnight, "I would agree with that statement. To privatize would be a no-brainer. It would only be thought about by someone with no brain."

    New plans, obtained from the State Department by Newsnight and Harper's Magazine under the US Freedom of Information Act, called for creation of a state-owned oil company favoured by the US oil industry. It was completed in January 2004 under the guidance of Amy Jaffe of the James Baker Institute in Texas.

    Formerly US Secretary of State, Baker is now an attorney representing Exxon-Mobil and the Saudi Arabian government.

    View segments of Iraq oil plans at www.GregPalast.com

    Questioned by Newsnight, Ms Jaffe said the oil industry prefers state control of Iraq's oil over a sell-off because it fears a repeat of Russia's energy privatisation. In the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union, US oil companies were barred from bidding for the reserves.

    Ms Jaffe says US oil companies are not warm to any plan that would undermine Opec and the current high oil price: "I'm not sure that if I'm the chair of an American company, and you put me on a lie detector test, I would say high oil prices are bad for me or my company."

    The former Shell oil boss agrees. In Houston, he told Newsnight: "Many neo conservatives are people who have certain ideological beliefs about markets, about democracy, about this, that and the other. International oil companies, without exception, are very pragmatic commercial organizations. They don't have a theology."

    A State Department spokesman told Newsnight they intended "to provide all possibilities to the Oil Ministry of Iraq and advocate none".

    Greg Palast's film - the result of a joint investigation by Newsnight and Harper's Magazine - will be broadcast on Thursday, 17 March, 2005.

    Newsnight is broadcast every weekday at 10.30pm on BBC Two in the UK.

    You can also watch the programme online - available for 24 hours after broadcast - from the Newsnight website

    /home/leaving?target=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.bbc.co.uk%2F1%2Fhi%2Fprogrammes%2Fnewsnight%2F4354269.stm" class="Popup

Leave a Comment