Really mods, you locked the "First time" thread?
Why is that not appropriate for NC, but a thread of a few days ago about libido OK? And a marriage thread that was just as (non) explicit was fine too?
How do you determine what is and is not OK?
How do you determine what is and is not OK?
To Trenell, MizKerri and geeky:
I pray none of you ever has to live in a communist state.
Geeky is my hero. She's the true badass. The badass who doesn't even need to be a badass. There aren't enough O's in cool to describe her.
I pray none of you ever has to live in a communist state.
Geeky is my hero. She's the true badass. The badass who doesn't even need to be a badass. There aren't enough O's in cool to describe her.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I don't know, that's the only thing I could see as being semi inappropriate.
Singing the songs of angry (wo)men.
BC: 9.6.11
when will your favs?
That thread was clearly marked "adult," so properly supervised 12-year-olds would not end up in there anyway, and honestly, teens aren't even a large enough portion of Non-Hair to act like this board is frequented by children. Locking that thread says, "Sex is so dirty the very subject is tainted. Good girls don't ask questions or speak up about their fears. If you want to hear something more comforting than 'IT WILL HURT LIKE HELLFIRE AND YOU'LL GET AIDS AND DIE' then find it somewhere else." NC.com used to be a place where such disturbing messages weren't the only ones being sent. Not anymore, I guess.
...It's a siggie. :shock:
It's nothing compared to threads we've had in the past.
But mostly because I see nothing wrong or remotely offensive about women in a forum talking/sharing about their first time having sex.
A lot of the posters here have been posting a long time and have always been open and friendly and full of advice for anyone, old or new, who had questions about sex, periods, relationships, health etc. I've learnt a lot over the years and it has been great to know you could ask the women here questions you wouldn't always feel comfortable asking someone face to face IRL and you'd receive an honest and open answer.
It's a shame that, apparently, is no longer the case. I don't understand the 'this is not the place for this' comment by the mod and would like to know what the problem was.
did someone see CurlyEyes' post about being 12 when she joined here and have a freak-out?
http://labellatestarossa.blogspot.ca/
Little Mother of all the Roaches, President-for-Life of the MAC Harlots!
Highly porous. Color over grey.
I love all the Curl Junkie products. Still experimenting with gels and curl creams. Still hoping for 2nd day hair....
Every day is a gift :flower:
Yeah, I brought up my first time in Say It I Dare You 2 or 3 days ago. I would have discussed it again. It doesn't bother me to talk about it and I can remember finding it reassuring, and sometimes not so much, when I heard other women discussing it.
It would be rare to find a girl/young woman that was not curious about first time experiences.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Great cheerleader, rou!
Dogs and nature abhor a vacuum.
http://geaugadoggy.wordpress.com
Antonia summed it up perfectly.
I know any answer that is given will not be sufficient, however I shall give one. This line makes it problematic:
"Anyway, hopefully this thread can be informative to younger people with similar concerns".
Discussions in SIDY or threads that have these discussions without specifically targeting young girls are a different story. Simply put, this particular thread can be construed to be instructing young girls about sex. That is not something NC.com is about.
Also most people here are adults so.. Not good marketing IMO
I also really don't get what's wrong teaching girls about sex??
She said "younger people". Not children. Not girls. Not minors. She said informative, not instructing.
Words matter.
The "little ears shouldn't be hearing this stuff" excuse is the worst. Need I mention how the abstinence method being taught in schools now (aka the method of pretending that sex doesn't happen in real life so learning how to do it safely isn't important) has worked SO WELL lately. :roll:
no shampoo since Feb 2013
CG is just way too much to keep track of
medium porosity, medium density, medium everything
"Well you're... thin, for someone who likes food"
People have said that things were getting ridiculous around here, and I noticed a BIT, but when that happened I finally realized the real extent of it.
This entire forum is like a large group of friends for some people, and we have some real connections with people. A lot of us talk about things here in that we wouldn't even mention to people IRL.
I don't know what to say, but I'm just really put off by that. And even the response given here, to say you know that the answer will not be sufficient, just screams of a lack of concern for the members concern. SMH.
I feel like we've been heard more lately, and that's great. Is it possible there's more to this than we realize (re: ads, contests, etc.)?
Dogs and nature abhor a vacuum.
http://geaugadoggy.wordpress.com
It's very unfortunate. The thread was supposed to serve as a place for REAL women to share their honest experiences and dispel any myths surrounding sex. This is a forum of mostly women for goodness sakes! It wasn't even vulgar. Also the line that allegedly lead to the closing of the thread is very subjective and to construe the thread as "instructing young girls about sex" is far reaching. There are 50 year old women on this board, a "younger person" would be anyone younger than 50. That includes 40, 30, and 20 year olds....all of whom are by law adults. I am an adult. One old enough to use the phrase "younger people" and still refer to other younger adults. The thread wasn't for children which is why I indicated "adult" in the title. With all do respect, I believe the reasoning for locking the thread is grasping at straws. Also "instructing"? Instructing mean's teaching and the connotation implies "telling someone to do something". Nowhere in that topic was anyone attempting to tell/instruct girls on sex or have sex. That's comparable to saying informing young women on birth control is the same as telling them to HAVE sex. Once again, with all do respect, that's a very antiquated view of looking at the thread and it's those type of views that has women well into their forties ashamed of being sexual beings!
The thread was supposed to be supportive. There isn't a woman on this board who hasn't heard a myth regarding their body and sex, and I think that any topic that supports educating (adult women young and old) by way of hearing other women's experiences is not a bad thing. Just as I stated in the topic, for the LONGEST time (yes as even an adult) I was afraid of sex, not because of ME but because of what I "heard" from other uninformed women. I know I am not the only one. Our bodies aren't nasty or "taboo" and sex isn't either. I honestly feel that by locking that thread it inadvertently reinforced the attitude that "women shouldn't be talking about sex"...which is EXACTLY what the thread was supposed to dispel. It's just extremely unfortunate.....
Also I think that it was clear that the thread was supposed to be supportive and a place for women to share their experiences, so for that reason alone, if there were small minute things that lead to the topic being closed, wouldn't it have been okay to have edited the portion of the topic that was "inappropriate"? I would have gladly have done it to have prevented it from just being locked.